The Department of War suspended Army Colonel Scott Stephens after publicly stating that conservative activist Charlie Kirk “deserved to be assassinated” following Kirk’s tragic murder at Utah Valley University.
Story Highlights
- Colonel Stephens made inflammatory social media comments justifying Kirk’s assassination.
- War Secretary Pete Hegseth swiftly suspended the officer for celebrating political violence.
- The incident reveals a concerning anti-conservative sentiment within military ranks.
- Department of War implements a zero-tolerance policy for officers endorsing political violence.
Military Officer Celebrates Conservative Leader’s Murder
Colonel Scott Stephens crossed every line of military professionalism and human decency when he took to social media to mock and justify the brutal assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. The Army officer’s comments suggested that Kirk’s conservative rhetoric somehow warranted his violent death, leaving behind a grieving wife, Erika, and two young children. This represents a shocking breach of the military’s commitment to political neutrality and basic respect for human life.
Decommission and release him // Department of War Suspends Army Colonel Scott Stephens for Saying Charlie Kirk Deserved to be Assassinated | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila https://t.co/dXeYA8zQsb
— Musicgirl77 (@musicgirl77) September 15, 2025
The colonel’s statements came in the immediate aftermath of Kirk’s murder during a speaking event at Utah Valley University, when emotions ran high and graphic footage circulated on social media. Rather than showing the restraint and dignity expected of a military officer, Stephens chose to pour salt in the wounds of grieving Americans who respected Kirk’s work defending constitutional values and conservative principles.
Swift Justice from Trump Administration
War Secretary Pete Hegseth deserves credit for his immediate and decisive response to this disgraceful conduct. Unlike the previous administration’s tolerance for woke ideology infecting our military institutions, the Trump administration demonstrated that celebrating political violence will not be tolerated under any circumstances. The Department of War’s spokesperson Sean Parnell confirmed the agency is actively monitoring similar cases, sending a clear message that military personnel must maintain professionalism regardless of their personal political views.
This rapid response stands in stark contrast to the Biden administration’s approach, which often turned a blind eye to leftist bias within federal institutions while aggressively pursuing conservatives. The current leadership recognizes that maintaining public trust in our military requires holding all personnel to the same high standards of conduct, especially when dealing with sensitive political matters involving loss of life.
Deeper Problems Within Military Ranks
Stephens’ outrageous comments reveal a concerning pattern of anti-conservative bias that likely infected our military during years of woke indoctrination under previous leadership. When a commissioned officer feels comfortable publicly celebrating the murder of a conservative activist, it raises serious questions about how many others harbor similar extremist views while serving in uniform. The military’s Uniform Code of Military Justice exists precisely to prevent such politically motivated statements that undermine unit cohesion and public confidence.
In my opinion, this incident demonstrates why President Trump’s efforts to root out ideological extremism from our military institutions remain absolutely critical. We cannot allow our armed forces to become partisan weapons against American citizens who exercise their First Amendment rights to advocate for conservative values, constitutional principles, and traditional family structures that built this nation.
Media Coverage Reveals Troubling Pattern
The limited mainstream media coverage of this story exposes yet another example of leftist bias in American journalism. While conservative outlets immediately reported on Stephens’ despicable comments, major networks and newspapers largely ignored a story involving a military officer celebrating political assassination. This selective coverage protects those who share the media’s ideological agenda while amplifying any perceived misconduct by conservatives.
The fact that this story required alternative media sources to bring it to public attention demonstrates why Americans increasingly distrust traditional journalism. When military officers can celebrate political violence with minimal mainstream coverage, it becomes clear that our information ecosystem remains dangerously skewed against conservative Americans and their right to participate safely in public discourse.
