NAACP Plays Race Card

( – Labeling the criticism over her remarks that antisemitism is context-dependent as racist, President Derrick Johnson of the liberal NAACP recently voiced his support for Harvard President Claudine Gay, who has been embroiled in controversy.

Johnson’s defense comes amidst backlash against Gay for her failure to address issues related to antisemitism and her mishandling of allegations of plagiarism. Despite these challenges, Harvard University’s highest governing body continues to support Gay, claiming only “instances of inadequate citation” in her academic work.

During a recent Congressional hearing, Gay faced pointed questions regarding Harvard’s stance on calls for violence against the Jewish community, particularly about genocide. Her responses, which lacked clarity and hinged on “context,” sparked heavy criticism. In light of the backlash, Gay issued a statement asserting Harvard’s firm opposition to violence against Jews.

Expressing his stance on social media platform X, Johnson condemned the criticism against Gay, labeling it as “political theatrics advancing a White supremacist agenda.” He praised Gay’s academic and professional credentials, underscoring her decades of service in higher education.

The controversy also involves comments from billionaire hedge fund manager and Harvard alumnus Bill Ackman. Ackman’s criticism of Gay drew further attention to the issue, with an Essence article calling his remarks “an unabashed, racist attack” and an example of “misogynoir,” a term coined by Scholar and Professor Moya Bailey to describe the unique oppression and discrimination experienced by Black women.

In response to Johnson’s comments on X, Ackman questioned the label of “White supremacist” and addressed his previous calls for the resignations of MIT President Sally Kornbluth and University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill, who also testified at the House Education and the Workforce Committee hearing. Ackman challenged the notion that criticism of leaders from minority communities should automatically be viewed as racist or supremacist.

Magill has since resigned from her position, adding another layer to the ongoing debate about leftwing bias in leadership, diversity, equity, inclusion, and academic integrity within prestigious higher education institutions.